Should Google Buy Palm?

In our recent profile of Palm WebOS, as we compared our favorite OS to Palm’s offering, we couldn’t help but notice a lot of similarities. More than that, there seem to be a lot of complementary features to the two OS’s; where one is weak, the other is strong.

One area where Palm is weak is financially. Trading closed on Palm at just a hair over $4 on Friday, and is likely to go down even more this week. Google, of course, is just as solvent as ever.

Financially speaking, Google buying Palm could amount to Google spending as little as 2% of their cash reserves. Imagine the financial impact of your last set of tires, or the initial purchase of your last smartphone. That’s about it.

Technologically speaking, the acquisition of Google would mean a huge boon in Intellectual Property. If nothing else came of it, Google would be free to essentially rip off Palm’s interface, gestures, and multitasking interface, even if they didn’t actually use any code, talent, or resources from Palm to do it.

Another piece of the IP pie is Palm’s patent portfolio. If you look here at a post from last year, you’ll see a discussion of just four of Palm’s patents as they relate to Apple’s iPhone functionality. While the patents are somewhat technical and minor, Apple’s allegations toward HTC are equally arcane. Palm has been in the handheld business much longer than most (what was Google doing in 1996?), and has literally hundreds of patents related to that type of technology, a veritable ammo stockpile for the coming fight between Google and Apple.

But there are lingering questions about what Google realistically could do with Palm if they bought them.  They would be buying a massive inventory of unsold phones. What would they do with them? Logic dictates that they would have to keep Palm alive as a company long enough to get rid of the inventory.

Support becomes an issue as well. Google doesn’t exactly have a hot track record here. But there are a lot of Oreos and Pixies out there, meaning that Palm will have to exist at least until the warranty is up on those devices.

Google could go the other way with it, too. They could take the aesthetic of the Pre, size it up to modern phone size and specs, put a WebOS-ified Android 2.5 on it, get HTC to build it with good QC, and have a Nexus Two that would bring Palm users into the fold.

What do you think? Would buying Palm distract and slow down Google’s progress with Android, or, would it only make Google stronger? Let us know in the comments!

[lead picture features a figurine from Dyzplastic’s great Android toy lineup. Go here to find out where you can buy one.]

About Ryan Trevisol

Background: I was born, raised, and live in South Florida. I have a Bachelor in Management Information Systems from FAU, and work as a Computer Tech. I also make custom electric guitars with my father, and do some freelance web design work. Interests: I use mobile technology every day. The only way to stay on top of my crazy life is to keep all the aspects of my life under control is to keep everything recorded, organized, and reminding me digitally.

, ,

  • http://blackmesasource.com The_Assassin47

    I dont think Palm would go down that easy. I dislike Palm, so seeing it go would not make me sad, though competition is what fuels innovation!

  • http://blackmesasource.com The_Assassin47

    I dont think Palm would go down that easy. I dislike Palm, so seeing it go would not make me sad, though competition is what fuels innovation!

  • http://thenewshaft.spaces.live.com TheNewShaft

    I can’t really see a massive upside for Google here, apart from a few patents what can Google gain from acquiring Palm that it does not already have?

  • http://thenewshaft.spaces.live.com TheNewShaft

    I can’t really see a massive upside for Google here, apart from a few patents what can Google gain from acquiring Palm that it does not already have?

  • anon

    I agree assasin, but, as we all know, it doeznt allways work that way. Eg, bus fares… they are all over priced and its cheaper to drive, yet there is at least 10 different companies where i live.

  • anon

    I agree assasin, but, as we all know, it doeznt allways work that way. Eg, bus fares… they are all over priced and its cheaper to drive, yet there is at least 10 different companies where i live.

  • http://www.trevisol.com Ryan Trevisol

    They do seem to be trying to stay alive, announcing AT&T compatibility the day that I posted this, which made their stock go up by about 15 cents, and then down again.

    What about Palm don’t you like? What about WebOS would you not like to see integrated into Android?

  • http://www.trevisol.com Ryan Trevisol

    They do seem to be trying to stay alive, announcing AT&T compatibility the day that I posted this, which made their stock go up by about 15 cents, and then down again.

    What about Palm don’t you like? What about WebOS would you not like to see integrated into Android?

  • http://www.trevisol.com Ryan Trevisol

    @The New Shaft, those patents are priceless for Google right now.

    As covered in our Android vs. WebOS article from last week, there are a lot of slick mechanisms built into WebOS, that even if Palm went bankrupt or folded, Google could not use.

    I think the synergy inbox and calendar would be a great upgrade for Android.

  • http://www.trevisol.com Ryan Trevisol

    @The New Shaft, those patents are priceless for Google right now.

    As covered in our Android vs. WebOS article from last week, there are a lot of slick mechanisms built into WebOS, that even if Palm went bankrupt or folded, Google could not use.

    I think the synergy inbox and calendar would be a great upgrade for Android.

  • Jbona3

    Google can do a lot with Palm. Palm has some competencies that Google doesn’t, and Google needs them if they want to continue to grow the Android ecosystem:
    1) Hardware development – Granted Palm’s hardware is currently flimsy, however that’s fixable.
    2) Carrier support team – Palm has an experienced team to train and communicate with carriers (AT&T, TMobile, etc.)
    3) Android and WebOS are similarities – both are Linux based and Google will get a lot of experienced, ex-Apple/iPhone developers out of the deal.
    4) The Patents/IP – The Apple/HTC suit is aimed more at the Android OS than HTC’s hardware, and having the pre-existing OS Patents that Palm has will go a long way.
    5) They keep Palm away from other competitors (Nokia, Motorola, Dell, etc) who either have or want to develop proprietary OS’s.

    Those are my thoughts…it’s a no brainer, someone will buy Palm. The question is who, and it should be Google.

  • Jbona3

    Google can do a lot with Palm. Palm has some competencies that Google doesn’t, and Google needs them if they want to continue to grow the Android ecosystem:
    1) Hardware development – Granted Palm’s hardware is currently flimsy, however that’s fixable.
    2) Carrier support team – Palm has an experienced team to train and communicate with carriers (AT&T, TMobile, etc.)
    3) Android and WebOS are similarities – both are Linux based and Google will get a lot of experienced, ex-Apple/iPhone developers out of the deal.
    4) The Patents/IP – The Apple/HTC suit is aimed more at the Android OS than HTC’s hardware, and having the pre-existing OS Patents that Palm has will go a long way.
    5) They keep Palm away from other competitors (Nokia, Motorola, Dell, etc) who either have or want to develop proprietary OS’s.

    Those are my thoughts…it’s a no brainer, someone will buy Palm. The question is who, and it should be Google.